Davidson v. Gibson County Special School District

96 F. App'x 398
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 14, 2004
DocketNo. 03-5104
StatusPublished

This text of 96 F. App'x 398 (Davidson v. Gibson County Special School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davidson v. Gibson County Special School District, 96 F. App'x 398 (6th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kathy Davidson, on behalf of her son Brock, appeals the district court’s decision denying the Davidsons compensation for Gibson County Special School District’s alleged failure to provide Brock with a free and appropriate public education (FAPE), as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.

Oral argument, the parties’ briefs, and our study of both the appellate record and the applicable law, convince this court that the school district provided an educational program that met Brock’s particular needs, thereby satisfying the IDEA’S requirements. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons stated in that court’s October 25, 2002 order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 F. App'x 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-gibson-county-special-school-district-ca6-2004.