Davidson v. Florida National Bank of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Davidson v. Florida National Bank of Miami

412 So. 2d 946, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19849

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 1982·No. No. 81-1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s determination that Mr. Davidson was incompetent to make a gift of the property in question and that therefore the guardian bank was entitled to possession of said property is supported by sufficient evidence. We may not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court on disputed questions of fact unless such determination was clearly erroneous. Strawgate [947] v. Turner, 339 So.2d 1112 (Fla.1976); Westerman v. Shell’s City, Inc., 265 So.2d 43 (Fla.1972); Holland v. Gross, 89 So.2d 255 (Fla.1956); Neimark v. Abramson, 403 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s determination that Mr. Davidson was incompetent to make a gift of the property in question and that therefore the guardian bank was entitled to possession of said property is supported by sufficient evidence. We may not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court on disputed questions of fact unless such determination was clearly erroneous. Strawgate [947] v. Turner, 339 So.2d 1112 (Fla.1976); Westerman v. Shell’s City, Inc., 265 So.2d 43 (Fla.1972); Holland v. Gross, 89 So.2d 255 (Fla.1956); Neimark v. Abramson, 403 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

Davidson v. Florida National Bank of Miami, 412 So. 2d 946, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19849 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

412 So. 2d 946 (Davidson v. Florida National Bank of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related