Davidson v. Donovan & Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.
7 F. Cas. 30, 4 D.C. 578, 4 Cranch 578
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedMarch 15, 1835
StatusPublished
This text of 7 F. Cas. 30 (Davidson v. Donovan & Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davidson v. Donovan & Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co., 7 F. Cas. 30, 4 D.C. 578, 4 Cranch 578 (circtddc 1835).
Opinion
(mm. con.) was of opinion that the service of the attachment on the canal company, by giving the notice to Mr. Ingle, their clerk, as the officer, Mr. Woodward, was requested to do by the president and directors, was a sufficient service.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 F. Cas. 30, 4 D.C. 578, 4 Cranch 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-donovan-chesapeake-ohio-canal-co-circtddc-1835.