Davidson v. Davidson

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Davidson v. Davidson

115 A. 177, 80 N.H. 589, 1921 N.H. LEXIS 77

DecidedOctober 4, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 115 A. 177 (Davidson v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davidson v. Davidson, 115 A. 177, 80 N.H. 589, 1921 N.H. LEXIS 77 (N.H. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence authorized the submission of the case to the jury. The evidence first excepted to tended to discredit the testimony of one of the defendant’s witnesses. The admission of ■evidence not strictly rebutting, but otherwise competent, is not •error of law. The other evidence excepted to had a tendency to rebut a witness of the defendant, and furthermore it was competent in mitigation of damages. The remarks of counsel in argument, to which exceptions were taken, were justified by the evidence.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence authorized the submission of the case to the jury. The evidence first excepted to tended to discredit the testimony of one of the defendant’s witnesses. The admission of ■evidence not strictly rebutting, but otherwise competent, is not •error of law. The other evidence excepted to had a tendency to rebut a witness of the defendant, and furthermore it was competent in mitigation of damages. The remarks of counsel in argument, to which exceptions were taken, were justified by the evidence.

Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 A. 177, 80 N.H. 589, 1921 N.H. LEXIS 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-davidson-nh-1921.