Davidson v. Davidson
395 So. 2d 600, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28291
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 1981
DocketNos. 80-1143, 80-1144
StatusPublished
This text of 395 So. 2d 600 (Davidson v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Davidson v. Davidson, 395 So. 2d 600, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28291 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
Opinion
Despite her claim that the amount was inadequate, there is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion in fixing the attorney’s fees awarded the appellant-wife. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980); Taplin v. Taplin, 386 So.2d 1199, 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); compare, March v. March, 395 So.2d 200 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
March v. March
395 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Taplin v. Taplin
386 So. 2d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
395 So. 2d 600, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 28291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-davidson-fladistctapp-1981.