Davidson v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER MOTORS COMPANY, LLC
This text of 721 N.W.2d 576 (Davidson v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER MOTORS COMPANY, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Roseanne DAVIDSON and John Davidson, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
DAIMLERCHRYSLER MOTORS COMPANY, L.L.C., DaimlerChrysler Corporation, and DaimlerChrysler Canada, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
By order of June 10, 2005, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decision in Radeljak v. *577 DaimlerChrysler Corp (Docket No. 127679). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 19, 2006, 475 Mich. 598, 719 N.W.2d 40 (2006), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for reconsideration of the motion for dismissal on forum non conveniens grounds in light of Radeljak.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 N.W.2d 576, 477 Mich. 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-daimlerchrysler-motors-company-llc-mich-2006.