Davidson v. Colburn
54 Ill. App. 636, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 189
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The question in this case is entirely one of fact. The writer of this opinion is inclined to believe that the preponderance of the evidence is in favor of appellee. (The other members of the court think otherwise.). This court does not reverse judgments merely because it does not agree with the court below as to where the preponderance of the evidence lies.
After a careful examination of the record, we see no sufficient reason for interfering with the judgment rendered in this canse, and it is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davidson v. Colburn, 54 Ill. App. 636, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 189 (Ill. Ct. App. 1894).
54 Ill. App. 636 (Davidson v. Colburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pardridge v. Cutler
68 Ill. App. 569 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)