Davidson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Davidson v. City of New York

133 A.D. 352, 117 N.Y.S. 185, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2173

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 133 A.D. 352 (Davidson v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davidson v. City of New York, 133 A.D. 352, 117 N.Y.S. 185, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinions

Gaynor, J.:

This case did not go to the jury on the theory that oneflag might be above the other as much as 5 inches at the outside by the tree — the highest point. On the contrary, there was the testimony of an engineer that by actual measurement by him the elevation at such highest point was only 2J inches (and it gradually decreased to nothing at the outside of the flag walk, the width of which was 6 feet); and the learned trial Judge charged the jury that they had to accept that evidence as against the loose estimates which had been testified to. Moreover, the learned trial Judge refused to charge the request of the defendant that if the jury found that the elevation was only inches at the highest point, and ran from that down .to nothing, and that the plaintiff simply tripped and fell, the defendant was not liable; so that this is the precise point of the case. It is impos-sible to free a city from such slight defects, and unreasonable to say, or permit a jury to say, that they are “ obviously dangerous”, which is the test of the city’s liability.-. We know that they are not, [354]*354If they were, thousands and thousands would be hurt by them hourly. That it is “ possible ” for some one out of many, out of ■ . millions, it may be, to trip on such a defect, does not make it dangerous. Probability, not possibility, governs (Butler v. Village of Oxford, 186 N. Y. 444; Gastel v. City of New York, 194 id. 15).

The judgment should he reversed.

Jenks, Burr and.Miller, J.T., concurred; Woodward, J., read for affirmance. -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gaynor, J.:

This case did not go to the jury on the theory that oneflag might be above the other as much as 5 inches at the outside by the tree — the highest point. On the contrary, there was the testimony of an engineer that by actual measurement by him the elevation at such highest point was only 2J inches (and it gradually decreased to nothing at the outside of the flag walk, the width of which was 6 feet); and the learned trial Judge charged the jury that they had to accept that evidence as against the loose estimates which had been testified to. Moreover, the learned trial Judge refused to charge the request of the defendant that if the jury found that the elevation was only inches at the highest point, and ran from that down .to nothing, and that the plaintiff simply tripped and fell, the defendant was not liable; so that this is the precise point of the case. It is impos-sible to free a city from such slight defects, and unreasonable to say, or permit a jury to say, that they are “ obviously dangerous”, which is the test of the city’s liability.-. We know that they are not, [354]*354If they were, thousands and thousands would be hurt by them hourly. That it is “ possible ” for some one out of many, out of ■ . millions, it may be, to trip on such a defect, does not make it dangerous. Probability, not possibility, governs (Butler v. Village of Oxford, 186 N. Y. 444; Gastel v. City of New York, 194 id. 15).

The judgment should he reversed.

Jenks, Burr and.Miller, J.T., concurred; Woodward, J., read for affirmance. -

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D. 352, 117 N.Y.S. 185, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1909.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack