Davidson v. Citizens Building & Loan Co.

136 So. 344, 102 Fla. 707
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 3, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 136 So. 344 (Davidson v. Citizens Building & Loan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davidson v. Citizens Building & Loan Co., 136 So. 344, 102 Fla. 707 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Buford, C.J.

— The appeal in this case is from an order in a foreclosure suit entering a deficiency decree against appellants, who were assignors of the mortgage and endorsers of the notes which constituted the cause of action. The deficiency order or decree was dated May 9th, 1930, and filed May 13th, 1930.

The question presented by this appeal, i. e., “Is the Circuit Court authorized, in a foreclosure suit, to enter a deficiency decree against the payees and mortgagees when they have become endorsers and assignors of the notes and mortgage in due and regular course of business,” was definitely answered by this Court in the negative and set at rest in accord with the contention of appellants in the opinion and judgment in the case of Younghusband vs. Fort Pierce Bank & Trust Company, decided October 29th, 1930, and reported in 130 Sou. 725.

*708 On authority of the opinion and judgment in that case the decree appealed from should be reversed and it is so ordered.

Reversed.

Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur. Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Younghusband v. Fort Pierce Bank & Trust Co.
130 So. 725 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 So. 344, 102 Fla. 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-v-citizens-building-loan-co-fla-1931.