Davidson and Jones, Inc. v. County of New Hanover
This text of 259 S.E.2d 911 (Davidson and Jones, Inc. v. County of New Hanover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DAVIDSON AND JONES, INC.
v.
COUNTY OF NEW HANOVER
v.
Frank I. BALLARD, Herbert P. McKim and Robert W. Sawyer, t/d/b/a Ballard, McKim & Sawyer, Waff Brothers, Inc., Raymond International, and Soil and Material Engineers, Inc. and
Robert E. Lasater and Robert P. Hopkins, t/d/b/a Lasater-Hopkins.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Manning, Fulton & Skinner, Marshall, Williams, Gorham & Brawley, for Davidson & Jones, plaintiff.
Stevens, McGhee, Morgan & Lennon, for County of New Hanover, defendant.
Hogue, Hill, Jones, Nash & Lynch, for Frank I. Ballard, Herbert P. McKim and Robert W. Sawyer, t/d/b/a Ballard, McKim & Sawyer.
Maupin, Taylor & Ellis, Granville A. Ryals, for Waff Brothers, Inc.
Crossley & Johnson, for Raymond International.
Reynolds & Howard, for Soil & Material Engineers, Inc.
Young, Moore, Henderson & Alvis, for Lasater and Hopkins.
Miller, Johnston, Taylor & Allison, Trotter, Bondurant, Griffin, Miller & Hishon, for Associated General Contractors.
Tharrington, Smith & Hargrove, for American Institute of Architects.
Petition by several third party defendants for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 41 N.C.App. 661, 255 S.E.2d 580. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 S.E.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidson-and-jones-inc-v-county-of-new-hanover-nc-1979.