Davidoff v. Glenbrook Towers Condo. Ass'n, No. Cv93 133568s (Sep. 25, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Davidoff v. Glenbrook Towers Condo. Ass'n, No. Cv93 133568s (Sep. 25, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 11163

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedSeptember 25, 1995

DocketNo. CV93 133568S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 11163 (Davidoff v. Glenbrook Towers Condo. Ass'n, No. Cv93 133568s (Sep. 25, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Davidoff v. Glenbrook Towers Condo. Ass'n, No. Cv93 133568s (Sep. 25, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 11163 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#119) All parties agree to the matter being sent to Judge Karazin for decision in lieu of Judge D'Andrea. The defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied. Although it is well settled that a "principal . . . is bound by, and liable for, the acts which his agent does with or within the actual or apparent authority from the principal and within the scope of the agent's authority. . . . The nature and extent of an agent's authority is a question of fact for the trier." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Bank of Montreal v. Gallo, 3 Conn. App. 269, 273, CT Page 11164487 A.2d 1101, cert. denied, 195 Conn. 803, 491 A.2d 1103 (1985). In the present case genuine issues of material fact exist as to the nature and extent of the authority of the defendant, Plaza Realty, and Management Corp. and whether the defendant was acting within the scope of such authority.

KARAZIN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#119) All parties agree to the matter being sent to Judge Karazin for decision in lieu of Judge D'Andrea. The defendant's motion for summary judgment is denied. Although it is well settled that a "principal . . . is bound by, and liable for, the acts which his agent does with or within the actual or apparent authority from the principal and within the scope of the agent's authority. . . . The nature and extent of an agent's authority is a question of fact for the trier." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Bank of Montreal v. Gallo, 3 Conn. App. 269, 273, CT Page 11164487 A.2d 1101, cert. denied, 195 Conn. 803, 491 A.2d 1103 (1985). In the present case genuine issues of material fact exist as to the nature and extent of the authority of the defendant, Plaza Realty, and Management Corp. and whether the defendant was acting within the scope of such authority.

KARAZIN, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 11163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davidoff-v-glenbrook-towers-condo-assn-no-cv93-133568s-sep-25-1995-connsuperct-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack