Davide v. Eastern National Bank

138 So. 3d 1129, 2014 WL 1921322, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7124
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 2014·No. No. 3D12-2934·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record in this case, we dismiss the appeal for lack of standing on the part of Appellant, Anthony L. Davide, who was not a beneficiary under the land trust at issue in this case. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(g)(1) (defining “Appellant” as a “party”); Portfolio Invs. Corp. v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 81 So.3d 534, 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Generally, a non-party in the lower tribunal is [1130] a ‘stranger to the record’ and, therefore, lacks standing to appeal an order entered by the lower tribunal” (citing Barnett v. Barnett, 705 So.2d 63, 64 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997))).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davide v. Eastern National Bank, 138 So. 3d 1129, 2014 WL 1921322, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7124 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

138 So. 3d 1129 (Davide v. Eastern National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnett v. Barnett
705 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Portfolio Investments Corp. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
81 So. 3d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)