Davide v. Eastern National Bank

138 So. 3d 1129, 2014 WL 1921322, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7124
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 14, 2014
DocketNo. 3D12-2934
StatusPublished

This text of 138 So. 3d 1129 (Davide v. Eastern National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davide v. Eastern National Bank, 138 So. 3d 1129, 2014 WL 1921322, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7124 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and record in this case, we dismiss the appeal for lack of standing on the part of Appellant, Anthony L. Davide, who was not a beneficiary under the land trust at issue in this case. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(g)(1) (defining “Appellant” as a “party”); Portfolio Invs. Corp. v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 81 So.3d 534, 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Generally, a non-party in the lower tribunal is [1130]*1130a ‘stranger to the record’ and, therefore, lacks standing to appeal an order entered by the lower tribunal” (citing Barnett v. Barnett, 705 So.2d 63, 64 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997))).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barnett v. Barnett
705 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Portfolio Investments Corp. v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
81 So. 3d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 So. 3d 1129, 2014 WL 1921322, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davide-v-eastern-national-bank-fladistctapp-2014.