Davide v. Eastern National Bank
Opinion
Upon review of the briefs and record in this case, we dismiss the appeal for lack of standing on the part of Appellant, Anthony L. Davide, who was not a beneficiary under the land trust at issue in this case. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(g)(1) (defining “Appellant” as a “party”); Portfolio Invs. Corp. v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 81 So.3d 534, 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (“Generally, a non-party in the lower tribunal is [1130] a ‘stranger to the record’ and, therefore, lacks standing to appeal an order entered by the lower tribunal” (citing Barnett v. Barnett, 705 So.2d 63, 64 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997))).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
138 So. 3d 1129 (Davide v. Eastern National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.