David William Trappman v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 2021·No. 19-1883·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D19-1883 _____________________________

DAVID WILLIAM TRAPPMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. David Rimmer, Judge.

September 29, 2021

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC, AND FOR CERTIFICATION OF CONFLICT TO THE SUPREME COURT

M.K. THOMAS, J.

Appellant filed a Motion for Rehearing, Rehearing En Banc, and for Certification of Conflict. We deny the motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc. We certify conflict with the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Olivard v. State, 831 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

BILBREY and TANENBAUM JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

David William Trappman, pro se, Appellant.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David William Trappman v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

David William Trappman v. State of Florida (David William Trappman v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olivard v. State
831 So. 2d 823 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)