David William Runyon v. the State of Texas
This text of David William Runyon v. the State of Texas (David William Runyon v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-22-00043-CR NO. 09-22-00044-CR __________________
DAVID WILLIAM RUNYON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 21-03-03965-CR & 21-03-03966-CR __________________________________________________________________
ORDER
Appellant David William Runyon filed a motion to abate the appeals and
remand the cases for written findings of fact and conclusions of law. Findings of fact
and conclusions of law made by the judge who conducted the hearing on the motion
to suppress may aid this Court’s review of the issues raised in the appellant’s brief.
See State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). The State has not
filed an objection to an abatement.
1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeals are abated and the cases are
remanded to the trial court for entry of findings of fact and conclusions of law on the
trial court’s essential findings on the issues raised in the hearing of appellant’s
motion to suppress. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4. In each appeal, a supplemental clerk’s
record containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are due to
be filed in this Court by July 7, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(2). All appellate
timetables are suspended pending filing of the supplemental clerk’s records with this
Court. The appeals will be reinstated without further order when the supplemental
clerk’s records are filed with the appellate court. The brief of the appellant is due
thirty days after the supplemental clerk’s records are filed. Requests for briefing
extensions will be strongly disfavored.
ORDER ENTERED June 7, 2022.
PER CURIAM
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David William Runyon v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-william-runyon-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.