David Wayne Underwood v. John Bryant, Correctional Officer

812 F.2d 1402, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2469, 1987 WL 35888
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 24, 1987
Docket86-7286
StatusUnpublished

This text of 812 F.2d 1402 (David Wayne Underwood v. John Bryant, Correctional Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Wayne Underwood v. John Bryant, Correctional Officer, 812 F.2d 1402, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2469, 1987 WL 35888 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

812 F.2d 1402
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David Wayne UNDERWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John BRYANT, Correctional Officer, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 86-7286.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 28, 1987.
Decided Feb. 24, 1987.

Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

David Wayne Underwood, appellant pro se.

James Greer Welsh, Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, PC, for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

David Wayne Underwood, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. The district court entered its judgment on August 13, 1986. Underwood had until September 12 to file a timely appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1) (notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of entry of judgment). Underwood's notice of appeal was filed on September 15. Underwood did not request an extension, and we are unable to construe an untimely notice of appeal as a motion for an extension of time. See Shah v. Hutto, 722 F.2d 1167 (4th Cir.1983) (en banc), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 975 (1984). Thus, we lack jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Berras-Rivera (Manuel Enrique)
812 F.2d 1402 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)
Shah v. Hutto
722 F.2d 1167 (Fourth Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
812 F.2d 1402, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2469, 1987 WL 35888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-wayne-underwood-v-john-bryant-correctional-officer-ca4-1987.