David Wayne Bailey v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 18, 2010·No. 13-10-00253-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-10-00253-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

DAVID WAYNE BAILEY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, David Wayne Bailey, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 18th day of November, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Wayne Bailey v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

David Wayne Bailey v. State (David Wayne Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.