David W. Palmer v. United States

271 F.2d 786
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 10, 1959
Docket17855_1
StatusPublished

This text of 271 F.2d 786 (David W. Palmer v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David W. Palmer v. United States, 271 F.2d 786 (5th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, an attorney at law, successfully represented several operators of fishing boats, pursuant to a fifty per cent, contingent fee agreement, in recovering from the United States illegally collected transportation taxes. Recoveries were denied where it was not shown that the operators had borne the economic burden of the tax. See United States v. Walls, 5 Cir., 1956, 231 F.2d 440.

The appellant here seeks to assert an attorney’s charging lien against the United States for half the amount of transportation taxes paid by his clients but which they had collected from their passengers, on the theory, as expressed by the appellant, that as a result of his efforts unknown persons were entitled to tax refunds. The district court dismissed thQ appellant’s claim as being without merit. The appellant’s claim of lien relates to tax refunds which his clients have not recovered and are not entitled to recover. Those who may have had a right of recovery have not asserted their rights and are not clients of the appellant. It follows that the judgment of the distinct court must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Benson Walls
231 F.2d 440 (Fifth Circuit, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 F.2d 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-w-palmer-v-united-states-ca5-1959.