David W. Harker v. Stephen Shiloh, Sui General Manager Maryland Division of Correction

21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15900, 1994 WL 118380
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 1994
Docket94-6074
StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 422 (David W. Harker v. Stephen Shiloh, Sui General Manager Maryland Division of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David W. Harker v. Stephen Shiloh, Sui General Manager Maryland Division of Correction, 21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15900, 1994 WL 118380 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

21 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

David W. HARKER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Stephen SHILOH, SUI General Manager; Maryland Division of
Correction, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6074.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-93-4030-DKC)

David W. Harker, Appellant Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harker v. Shiloh, No. CA-93-4030-DKC (D. Md. Dec. 29, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F.3d 422, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15900, 1994 WL 118380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-w-harker-v-stephen-shiloh-sui-general-manage-ca4-1994.