David Vasquez v. State
This text of David Vasquez v. State (David Vasquez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-14-00508-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
DAVID VASQUEZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria Order Per Curiam This cause is before the Court on appellant’s motion to remand to trial court for
new trial, the State’s response and motion to abate appeal, and appellant’s motion for
extension of time to file the brief. The reporter’s record consisting of four volumes was
filed with this Court on October 28, 2014. The reporter has notified this Court that volume
5, consisting of the exhibits, cannot be filed because the exhibits are not in her possession and cannot be located. Appellant states the lost exhibits were original exhibits and
cannot be replaced by agreement. The State has responded that it may be possible to
obtain duplicate exhibits, or the exhibits may be located.
Because of the unknown status of the exhibits, we GRANT the State’s motion to
abate and remand. Appellant’s motion for new trial is CARRIED WITH THE CASE.
This appeal is ABATED and the matter is REMANDED to the trial court. In accordance
with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(f)(4), the trial court is directed to conduct a
hearing to determine: (1) if the appellant has timely requested a reporter's record; (2) if,
without the appellant's fault, a significant exhibit or a significant portion of the court
reporter's notes and records has been lost or destroyed or - if the proceedings were
electronically recorded - a significant portion of the recording has been lost or destroyed
or is inaudible; (3) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record, or
the lost and destroyed exhibit, is necessary to the appeal's resolution; and (4) if the lost,
destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record cannot be replaced by agreement
of the parties, or the lost or destroyed exhibit cannot be replaced either by agreement of
the parties or with a copy determined by the trial court to accurately duplicate with
reasonable certainty the original exhibit. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f).
The trial court is directed to forward the record of the proceedings, including any
orders and findings, to this Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, or to
notify this Court within such period indicating a date by which the trial court can comply.
Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED pending
resolution of the matter herein.
It is so ordered.
2 PER CURIAM
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed the 19th day of December, 2014.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Vasquez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-vasquez-v-state-texapp-2014.