David v. State

100 S.E. 763, 24 Ga. App. 369, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 670
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 5, 1919
Docket10877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 S.E. 763 (David v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David v. State, 100 S.E. 763, 24 Ga. App. 369, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 670 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The charge of the court upon the defense of alibi is not subject to the criticism urged against it. It was understandable, not confusing, and correctly charged upon this particular defense. See Smith v. State, 3 Ga. App. 803 (61 S. E. 737).

2. The evidence for the State, if believed by the jury, demanded the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge. This court can not set a verdict aside where the jury who sees and hears the witnesses give credit to one version rather than the other. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodicorth, J., eoneur. George C. Palmer, for plaintiff in error. C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. McClellan
55 S.E.2d 736 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 763, 24 Ga. App. 369, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-v-state-gactapp-1919.