David v. State
863 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 613, 2004 WL 130738
Opinion
Lionel David appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The trial court denied the motion as insufficient to support relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) because it raises factual questions. We affirm the denial of the motion without prejudice to any right Appellant might have to file a facially sufficient claim under rule 3.850. See Jackson v. State, 803 So.2d 842, 843 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), Young v. State, 787 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David v. State, 863 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 613, 2004 WL 130738 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
863 So. 2d 1282 (David v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. State
787 So. 2d 259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Jackson v. State
803 So. 2d 842 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)