David v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

David v. State

863 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 613, 2004 WL 130738

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 28, 2004

DocketNo. 3D03-3376

StatusPublished

This text of 863 So. 2d 1282 (David v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David v. State, 863 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 613, 2004 WL 130738 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lionel David appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The trial court denied the motion as insufficient to support relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) because it raises factual questions. We affirm the denial of the motion without prejudice to any right Appellant might have to file a facially sufficient claim under rule 3.850. See Jackson v. State, 803 So.2d 842, 843 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), Young v. State, 787 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lionel David appeals an order denying his motion to correct illegal sentence. The trial court denied the motion as insufficient to support relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) because it raises factual questions. We affirm the denial of the motion without prejudice to any right Appellant might have to file a facially sufficient claim under rule 3.850. See Jackson v. State, 803 So.2d 842, 843 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), Young v. State, 787 So.2d 259 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

863 So. 2d 1282, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 613, 2004 WL 130738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack