David v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit

David v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

120 F.3d 1199, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22845, 1997 WL 471360

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedAugust 29, 1997

Docket96-7034

StatusPublished

This text of 120 F.3d 1199 (David v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc., 120 F.3d 1199, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22845, 1997 WL 471360 (11th Cir. 1997).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

With respect to the summary judgment in favor of SmithKline, we assume arguendo, but need not decide, that an employer may be liable under some circumstances in a case involving harassment of an employee, not by the employer or its employees, but by a third person. However, we conclude on this record that SmithKline’s response to plaintiff’s reports of harassment was reasonable in light of the options available to SmithKline.¹

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

With respect to the summary judgment in favor of SmithKline, we assume arguendo, but need not decide, that an employer may be liable under some circumstances in a case involving harassment of an employee, not by the employer or its employees, but by a third person. However, we conclude on this record that SmithKline’s response to plaintiff’s reports of harassment was reasonable in light of the options available to SmithKline.¹

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 F.3d 1199, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 22845, 1997 WL 471360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-v-smithkline-beecham-clinical-laboratories-inc-ca11-1997.