David v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

David v. New York City Housing Authority

59 A.D.2d 668, 398 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13590

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 668 (David v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David v. New York City Housing Authority, 59 A.D.2d 668, 398 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 15, 1977, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We quite agree with the conclusion of Special Term that petitioner’s suspension was improper from the very outset. We would add however that, in any event, respondent-appellant housing authority was solely responsible for the ensuing delay in processing what proved to be unfounded charges. The credible evidence is entirely to this effect and, except for the first 30 days, petitioner is entitled to be paid up to the time of reinstatement. Concur—Birns, J. P., Lane, Markewich and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 15, 1977, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We quite agree with the conclusion of Special Term that petitioner’s suspension was improper from the very outset. We would add however that, in any event, respondent-appellant housing authority was solely responsible for the ensuing delay in processing what proved to be unfounded charges. The credible evidence is entirely to this effect and, except for the first 30 days, petitioner is entitled to be paid up to the time of reinstatement. Concur—Birns, J. P., Lane, Markewich and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 668, 398 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1977.