David v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
54 A.2d 731, 136 N.J.L. 195, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 255
Opinion
The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, Wachenfeld, Eastwood, Burling, Wells, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 54 A.2d 731, 136 N.J.L. 195, 1947 N.J. LEXIS 255 (N.J. 1947).
54 A.2d 731 (David v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hirko v. Hirko
398 A.2d 1353 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Hirsch v. Travelers Insurance Company
380 A.2d 715 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Continental Assur. Co. v. Conroy
111 F. Supp. 370 (D. New Jersey, 1953)
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Phillips
68 A.2d 574 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)