David v. Martinez v. Clarissa Ann Rodriguez
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00843-CV
David V. MARTINEZ, Appellant
v. Clarissa Ann Clarissa Ann RODRIGUEZ, Appellee
From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013-EM-505713 Honorable Olin B. Strauss, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 7, 2014
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
Appellant’s brief was originally due on March 3, 2014. On March 17, 2014, this court
notified appellant, who is pro se, that the brief was late and stated he must, within ten days, provide
a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief. Appellant did not respond.
Accordingly, on April 7, 2014, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing, no later than
April 18, 2014, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 38.8(a). Our order cautioned appellant that if he did not respond by April 18, 2014, this appeal 04-13-00843-CV
would be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Id. Appellant has not responded; therefore, this appeal
is dismissed for lack of prosecution.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David v. Martinez v. Clarissa Ann Rodriguez (David v. Martinez v. Clarissa Ann Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.