David v. Hubbard
280 U.S. 514, 74 L. Ed. 585
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1929·No. No. 190; No. 191·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
The motions for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis are denied. The Court has examined the unprinted records submitted in support of the petitions for certiorari and finds that the attacks upon the action of the court below are without any substantial merit. For this-reason the petitions for writs of certiorari are denied, and the clerk is directed to [515]*515enter the usual order with respect to the payment of costs already incurred, as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David v. Hubbard, 280 U.S. 514, 74 L. Ed. 585 (1929).
280 U.S. 514 (David v. Hubbard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Chelsea Hotel Corporation, Debtor, 601 West 26 Corp. And Claire Freidus
241 F.2d 846 (Third Circuit, 1957)
No. 12136
241 F.2d 846 (Third Circuit, 1957)
Newberry v. City of Andalusia
57 So. 2d 629 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
In re Peoples Cab Co.
89 F. Supp. 577 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1950)
In Re Great Western Petroleum Corporation
16 F. Supp. 247 (S.D. California, 1936)
In Re Faerstein
58 F.2d 942 (Ninth Circuit, 1932)
Cossack v. Moore
58 F.2d 942 (Ninth Circuit, 1932)