David v. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

David v. Green

233 A.D.2d 476, 650 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12649

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 25, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 233 A.D.2d 476 (David v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David v. Green, 233 A.D.2d 476, 650 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12649 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for [477]*477personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Colar, J.), dated September 26, 1995, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3212.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendant made out a prima facie case that the plaintiff had not sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The only competent medical evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion was an affidavit dated August 29, 1995, which was prepared by Dr. Lawrence Shields. This affidavit failed to provide objective evidence of the extent or degree of the plaintiffs alleged limitation and its duration (see, Beckett v Conte, 176 AD2d 774). Dr. Shields’ statement in his affidavit that the plaintiff had sustained herniated discs is not supported by any tests performed on the plaintiff subsequent to the subject accident. Indeed, a report based on the Magnetic Resonance Imaging exam that the plaintiff underwent approximately two weeks after the subject accident indicated that there was "no focal herniation”. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for [477]*477personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Colar, J.), dated September 26, 1995, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3212.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendant made out a prima facie case that the plaintiff had not sustained a serious injury as defined by Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The only competent medical evidence submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion was an affidavit dated August 29, 1995, which was prepared by Dr. Lawrence Shields. This affidavit failed to provide objective evidence of the extent or degree of the plaintiffs alleged limitation and its duration (see, Beckett v Conte, 176 AD2d 774). Dr. Shields’ statement in his affidavit that the plaintiff had sustained herniated discs is not supported by any tests performed on the plaintiff subsequent to the subject accident. Indeed, a report based on the Magnetic Resonance Imaging exam that the plaintiff underwent approximately two weeks after the subject accident indicated that there was "no focal herniation”. Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D.2d 476, 650 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-v-green-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack