David v. Goodenow
This text of David v. Goodenow (David v. Goodenow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 30592
lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAlQL. ha
MAlLE P. DAVlD, CANDlDA ABRlL and § §§ NELLlE J. MEDElROS, PetitiOnerS, == ai
w isn
VS.
,®
KENNETH GooDEN0w, coUNTY cLERK 0F THE coUNp m HAwA:1, sTATE oF HAwArI, Resp@ndent. §§
B|=H Md
ORlGlNAL PROCEEDING
ORDER GRANTlNG lN PART PETlTlON FOR A WRlT OF MANDAMUS (By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Recktenwald, JJ. and Circuit Judqe Kubo, in place of Duffy, J., recused)
Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus filed by petitioners Maile P. David, Candida Abril, and
Nellie J. Medeiros and the papers in support, IT lS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is granted in part. Respondent shall issue nomination
papers to Maile P. DaVid pursuant to the Application for 20lO,
Nomination Papers submitted by Maile P. David on June 25,
20lO.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawafi, July 151
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David v. Goodenow, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-v-goodenow-haw-2010.