David v. Flint

900 So. 2d 782, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7240, 2005 WL 1162951
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 18, 2005·No. No. 2D04-1750·Published

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Monica David, as Chairman of the Florida Parole Commission, challenges the trial court order granting Ralph Flint, Jr.’s request for a writ of prohibition. Although this was initially filed as a petition for a writ of certiorari, this court converted it to a direct appeal.

David challenges the trial court’s determination that Flint could not be on conditional release supervision while detained under the Jimmy Ryce Act.1 Given this court’s recent decision in Parole Commission v. Smith, 896 So.2d 966, 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), concluding that “an individual may be on conditional release supervision while detained under the Ryce Act,” we reverse.

Reversed.

NORTHCUTT and VILLANTI, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David v. Flint, 900 So. 2d 782, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 7240, 2005 WL 1162951 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

900 So. 2d 782 (David v. Flint) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PAROLE COM'N v. Smith
896 So. 2d 966 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)