David v. Ferguson

584 S.E.2d 102, 160 N.C. App. 89, 2003 N.C. App. LEXIS 1665

• Court: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
• Decided: August 19, 2003
• Docket: No. COA02-84-2
• Status: Published

Opinion

BRYANT, Judge.

This case comes before us on remand from the North Carolina Supreme Court for reconsideration of our decision in light of its holding in Rosero v. Blake, 357 N.C. 193, 581 S.E.2d 41 (2003) that the common law presumption in favor of awarding custody to the mother of an illegitimate child has been abrogated by statutory and case law. Id. at 199, 581 S.E.2d at 45; see N.C.G.S. § 50-13.2(a) (2001).

In the case sub judice, defendant-mother contended the trial court had erred by applying the best interest of the child standard in awarding joint custody of the parties’ illegitimate children instead of using the common law presumption. This Court agreed with defendant and reversed and remanded the case based on what was then binding precedent established by the Court of Appeals in Rosero, which recognized the existence of the presumption in favor of the mother. David v. Ferguson, 153 N.C. App. 482, 571 S.E.2d 230 (2002); Rosero v. Blake, 150 N.C. App. 250, 563 S.E.2d 248 (2002). The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Rosero, however, reversed the Court of Appeals decision and held that:

the father’s right to custody of his illegitimate child is legally equal to that of the child’s mother, and, as dictated by section 50-13.2, if the best interest of the child is served by placing the child in the father’s custody, he is to be awarded custody of that child.

Rosero, 357 N.C. at 208, 581 S.E.2d at 50.

Having reconsidered David v. Ferguson in light of the above holding, we now conclude that the trial court applied the correct standard as between the parents of an illegitimate child. Accordingly, we reverse our initial holding and affirm the trial court’s custody order.

Affirmed.

Judges McCULLOUGH and TYSON concur.