David v. David

493 P.2d 186, 8 Or. App. 166, 1972 Ore. App. LEXIS 1052
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 4, 1972
DocketNo. 351-212
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 493 P.2d 186 (David v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David v. David, 493 P.2d 186, 8 Or. App. 166, 1972 Ore. App. LEXIS 1052 (Or. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion to reduce child support payments previously set by the court in the original decree of divorce in accordance with the parties’ child support and property settlement agreement. The plaintiff contends that the record conclusively shows that the only change of circumstance is that the income of the defendant was higher at the time of the hearing on the defendant’s motion to reduce support payments than his income at the time the decree was entered.

The defendant has not filed a brief. In the absence of a brief from defendant we will not search the record, and assume that the plaintiff’s recitations as to the state of the record are correct.

Eeversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Jackson v. Jackson
499 P.2d 1376 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
493 P.2d 186, 8 Or. App. 166, 1972 Ore. App. LEXIS 1052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-v-david-orctapp-1972.