David v. David
This text of 162 A. 538 (David v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We concur for the most part in the results reached by the advisory master, and for the reasons stated by him.
But we conclude that the amount of the second counsel fee allowed, $500, is excessive and that it should be reduced to $150. We think also that the allowance of $30 per week alimony was, under the circumstances, excessive, and that it should be reduced to $20 per week. With the above modifications the decrees brought up will be affirmed. No costs will be allowed.
For modification — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 13.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 A. 538, 111 N.J. Eq. 493, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-v-david-nj-1932.