David Torrance Monroe v. State
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00772-CR No. 04-08-00773-CR No. 04-08-00774-CR
David Torrance MONROE, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2006-CR-10969A, 2006-CR-10970A & 2006-CR-10972 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 10, 2008
DISMISSED
The trial court signed certifications of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-
bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule
25.2(d) provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the
right of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). 04-08-00772-CR, 04-08-00773-CR, 04-08-00774-CR
Accordingly, on November 6, 2008, this court issued an order stating these appeals would be
dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless amended trial court certifications that show defendant has
the right of appeal were made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174
(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order); TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1.
On November 21, 2008, defendant’s appellate counsel filed letters stating “this court has no
choice but to dismiss the appeal.” In light of the record presented, we agree with defendant’s counsel
that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss these appeals. Accordingly, these appeals are
dismissed.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Torrance Monroe v. State (David Torrance Monroe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.