David Toneman v. U.S. Bank

628 F. App'x 523
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 7, 2016·No. 13-56950·Unpublished·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

David and Kelly Toneman appeal from the judgment dismissing their Second Amended Complaint with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Tonemans challenge the district court’s dismissal of their claims for wrongful foreclosure, slander of title, negligence, fraud, and unfair business practices on various grounds. We affirm dismissal of these claims for the reasons stated in the district court’s order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Toneman v. U.S. Bank, 628 F. App'x 523 (9th Cir. 2016).

628 F. App'x 523 (David Toneman v. U.S. Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foyer v. Wells Fargo, NA.
S.D. California, 2020