David Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

David Thomas v. State

DecidedMay 13, 2009

Docket12-09-00138-CR

StatusPublished

This text of David Thomas v. State (David Thomas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David Thomas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-09-00138-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DAVID THOMAS, § APPEAL FROM THE 294TH APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant pleaded guilty to theft of property having a value of $1,500 or more but less than $20,000, a state jail felony. See TEX . PENAL CODE ANN . § 31.03(e)(4)(A) (Vernon Supp. 2008). The trial court sentenced Appellant to confinement for eighteen months. We have received the trial court’s certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and Appellant has no right to appeal. See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The certification is signed by Appellant and indicates that Appellant had waived his right to counsel. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered May 13, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-09-00138-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DAVID THOMAS, § APPEAL FROM THE 294TH APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant pleaded guilty to theft of property having a value of $1,500 or more but less than $20,000, a state jail felony. See TEX . PENAL CODE ANN . § 31.03(e)(4)(A) (Vernon Supp. 2008). The trial court sentenced Appellant to confinement for eighteen months. We have received the trial court’s certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and Appellant has no right to appeal. See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The certification is signed by Appellant and indicates that Appellant had waived his right to counsel. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered May 13, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

David Thomas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-thomas-v-state-texapp-2009.