David Terrence Stephens v. Department of Corrections
This text of David Terrence Stephens v. Department of Corrections (David Terrence Stephens v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D20-2958 _____________________________
DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Charles W. Dodson, Judge.
September 28, 2022
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review from a circuit court order dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus as untimely. Appellant argued there were due process errors in several disciplinary proceedings, many of them years old. We affirm because none of the challenged proceedings occurred within thirty days of the date that Appellant filed his petition as required by section 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Any action challenging prisoner disciplinary proceedings shall be barred by the court unless it is commenced within the time period provided by this section.”).
AFFIRMED.
LEWIS, TANENBAUM, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
David Terrence Stephens, pro se, Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant Attorney General, and Lance Eric Neff, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Terrence Stephens v. Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-terrence-stephens-v-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2022.