David T. Fordham v. Venus A. Morganco

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 2016
DocketA16A1624
StatusPublished

This text of David T. Fordham v. Venus A. Morganco (David T. Fordham v. Venus A. Morganco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David T. Fordham v. Venus A. Morganco, (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ May 13, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1624. DAVID T. FORDHAM v. VENUS A. MORGAN.

A trial court found David T. Fordham in contempt for failing to pay $39,704.98 in child support. Fordham filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction for two reasons. First, this case involves the collection of child support. Accordingly, it is a domestic relations matter within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2). See Collins v. Davis, 318 Ga. App. 265, 266 (1) (733 SE2d 798) (2012); Smoak v. Department of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Appeals in such matters must be taken by application for discretionary appeal. See Smoak, supra. Second, Fordham previously filed a discretionary application challenging the same contempt finding, which was denied on April 14, 2016. See Case Number A16D0311. Because that denial was an adjudication on the merits, the doctrine of res judicata bars this direct appeal. See Northwest Social & Civic Club, Inc. v. Franklin, 276 Ga. 859, 860 (583 SE2d 858) (2003); Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 260- 261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007) For these reasons, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 05/13/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Northwest Social and Civic Club, Inc. v. Franklin
583 S.E.2d 858 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Hook v. Bergen
649 S.E.2d 313 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Collins v. Davis
733 S.E.2d 798 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David T. Fordham v. Venus A. Morganco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-t-fordham-v-venus-a-morganco-gactapp-2016.