David Sweet v. Linda Sanders

180 F. App'x 601
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 10, 2006
Docket05-2582
StatusUnpublished

This text of 180 F. App'x 601 (David Sweet v. Linda Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Sweet v. Linda Sanders, 180 F. App'x 601 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

David Sweet appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he sought credit on his federal sentence for time he spent in state custody. We agree with the district court that Sweet was not entitled to federal *602 credit, because the record shows that the period of state detention at issue was credited against his state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) (“A defendant shall be given credit toward the service of a term of imprisonment for any time he has spent in official detention prior to the date the sentence commences ... that has not been credited against another sentence.”); United States v. Kramer, 12 F.3d 130, 132 (8th Cir.1993) (this statute prohibits double credit, i.e., federal prisoner is not entitled to credit on federal sentence when he received credit toward his state sentence for same time period), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1059, 114 S.Ct. 1629, 128 L.Ed.2d 352 (1994).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 F. App'x 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-sweet-v-linda-sanders-ca8-2006.