DAVID SUBIL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of DAVID SUBIL v. STATE OF FLORIDA (DAVID SUBIL v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DAVID SUBIL, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-280
[August 22, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Elizabeth Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-8070CF10A.
David Subil, Okeechobee, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DAVID SUBIL v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-subil-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.