David Stuart Seelye v. Laura Michelle Seelye

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 14, 2013·No. 02-12-00269-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00269-CV

DAVID STUART SEELYE APPELLANT

V.

LAURA MICHELLE SEELYE APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On December 17, 2012, and January 3, 2013, we notified appellant that

his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal

filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: February 14, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Stuart Seelye v. Laura Michelle Seelye, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

David Stuart Seelye v. Laura Michelle Seelye (David Stuart Seelye v. Laura Michelle Seelye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.