David Stuart Seelye v. Laura Michelle Seelye
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00269-CV
DAVID STUART SEELYE APPELLANT
V.
LAURA MICHELLE SEELYE APPELLEE
------------
FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On December 17, 2012, and January 3, 2013, we notified appellant that
his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal
filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for
want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DELIVERED: February 14, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Stuart Seelye v. Laura Michelle Seelye (David Stuart Seelye v. Laura Michelle Seelye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.