David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Graziadio

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Graziadio

95 N.Y.S. 1124

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1124 (David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Graziadio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Graziadio, 95 N.Y.S. 1124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gross abuse of discretion by the court in opening the default of the plaintiff not appearing, and after the entry of judgment the plaintiff “being at liberty to employ any other attorney to take such action in relation to the judgment and cause as he desired, without any order of substitution” (Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695, 696, 56 N. Y. Supp, [1125]*112580), the order appealed from must be affirmed. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gross abuse of discretion by the court in opening the default of the plaintiff not appearing, and after the entry of judgment the plaintiff “being at liberty to employ any other attorney to take such action in relation to the judgment and cause as he desired, without any order of substitution” (Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695, 696, 56 N. Y. Supp, [1125]*112580), the order appealed from must be affirmed. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 N.Y.S. 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-stevenson-brewing-co-v-graziadio-nyappterm-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack