David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Graziadio
95 N.Y.S. 1124
Opinion
Gross abuse of discretion by the court in opening the default of the plaintiff not appearing, and after the entry of judgment the plaintiff “being at liberty to employ any other attorney to take such action in relation to the judgment and cause as he desired, without any order of substitution” (Davis v. Solomon, 25 Misc. Rep. 695, 696, 56 N. Y. Supp, [1125]*112580), the order appealed from must be affirmed. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Graziadio, 95 N.Y.S. 1124 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
95 N.Y.S. 1124 (David Stevenson Brewing Co. v. Graziadio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. Solomon
25 Misc. 695 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1899)