David Stebbins v. State of Arkansas

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: May 24, 2019
• Docket: 18-2308
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-2308 ___________________________

David Anthony Stebbins

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

State of Arkansas; Amy Jones; Arkansas Rehabilitation Services

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Harrison ____________

Submitted: May 15, 2019 Filed: May 24, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

David Anthony Stebbins appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting summary judgment to defendants in his action under the Americans with Disabilities

1 The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Viewing the facts and inferences in the light most favorable to Stebbins, we conclude that the defendants were entitled to summary judgment. See Vandewarker v. Cont’l Res., Inc., 917 F.3d 626, 629 (8th Cir. 2019) (standard of review). We have also considered Stebbins’s challenges to numerous other orders, and we conclude that they do not warrant reversal.2 We affirm. ______________________________

2 We have not considered matters Stebbins advances for the first time on appeal. See Stone v. Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (declining to consider a pro se appellant’s “additional allegations or arguments raised on appeal that were not discussed by the district court”).

-2-