David Soto v. Texas State Bank

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 21, 2008
• Docket: 13-08-00126-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00126-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

DAVID SOTO, APPELLANT,

v.

TEXAS STATE BANK, APPELLEE.

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, David Soto, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo, County, Texas, in cause no. CL-06-2160-B. Upon review of the documents before the Court, the notice of appeal is not in compliance with Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d)(7). The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant failed to respond to the Court's notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 21st day of August, 2008.