DAVID SMITH v. HAROLD PEERENBOOM

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DAVID SMITH v. HAROLD PEERENBOOM

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 2020

Docket19-3155

StatusPublished

This text of DAVID SMITH v. HAROLD PEERENBOOM (DAVID SMITH v. HAROLD PEERENBOOM) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DAVID SMITH v. HAROLD PEERENBOOM, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID SMITH, Appellant,

v.

HAROLD PEERENBOOM, Appellee.

No. 4D19-3155

[March 26, 2020]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cymonie S. Rowe, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502018CA001996XXXMB.

John B. Rosenquest IV of Rosenquest Law Firm, P.A., Surfside, for appellant.

Maria H. Ruiz and Danielle F. Moriber of Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI