DAVID SHERROD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of DAVID SHERROD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (DAVID SHERROD v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DAVID EUGENE SHERROD, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D20-2776
[September 30, 2021]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael C. Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2017CF000523.
David Eugene Sherrod, Bowling Green, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mitchell A. Egber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CONNER, C.J., FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
DAVID SHERROD v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-sherrod-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.