David Shane Acosta v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 21, 2022
Docket09-22-00071-CR
StatusPublished

This text of David Shane Acosta v. the State of Texas (David Shane Acosta v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
David Shane Acosta v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________ NO. 09-22-00071-CR ________________

DAVID SHANE ACOSTA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 411th District Court Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. 27427 ________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In an open plea, Appellant David Shane Acosta pleaded guilty to the first-

degree felony offense of aggravated robbery. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03.

After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Acosta to fifteen years of

incarceration.

Acosta’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief that presents counsel’s

professional evaluation of the record and concludes that the appeal is

frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d

1 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On May 23, 2022, we granted an extension of time for

Acosta to file a pro se brief. We received no response from Acosta.

We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion

that no arguable issues support the appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order

appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d

503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.1

AFFIRMED.

________________________________ W. SCOTT GOLEMON Chief Justice

Submitted on August 29, 2022 Opinion Delivered September 21, 2022 Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

1Acosta may challenge our opinion in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.1. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Stafford v. State
813 S.W.2d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Sullivan v. State
573 S.W.2d 1 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
David Shane Acosta v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-shane-acosta-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.