David Scott Phillips v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 28, 2024·No. 2023-2339·Published

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 5D2023-2339

LT Case No. 2013-CF-002096

DAVID SCOTT PHILLIPS, Appellant, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

June 28, 2024

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders* appeal, we affirm Phillips’s judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following his plea. However,

*Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

we remand for entry of an amended cost/fees order showing the assessment of $100.00, instead of $150.00, for the cost of prosecution consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement.

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct cost of prosecution to $100.

MAKAR, WALLIS, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Scott Phillips v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

David Scott Phillips v. State of Florida (David Scott Phillips v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)