David Scott Phillips v. State of Florida
This text of David Scott Phillips v. State of Florida (David Scott Phillips v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2023-2339 LT Case No. 2013-CF-002096 _____________________________
DAVID SCOTT PHILLIPS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Stephen R. Putnam, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
June 28, 2024
PER CURIAM.
In this Anders* appeal, we affirm Phillips’s judgment and sentence imposed by the trial court following his plea. However,
*Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). we remand for entry of an amended cost/fees order showing the assessment of $100.00, instead of $150.00, for the cost of prosecution consistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct cost of prosecution to $100.
MAKAR, WALLIS, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Scott Phillips v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-scott-phillips-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.