David Schuette v. Kleo Hatziladas and Newtak Pty Ltd.
This text of David Schuette v. Kleo Hatziladas and Newtak Pty Ltd. (David Schuette v. Kleo Hatziladas and Newtak Pty Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-10-00378-CV
David Schuette, Appellant
v.
Kleo Hatziladas and Newtak Pty Ltd., Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-09-002784, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant David Schuette has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion,
Schuette represents that “[a]ll matters in dispute between the parties have been fully and finally
resolved in the underlying case and the necessity to continue the matter that is before this Court
no longer exists.” The certificate of conference indicates that appellees do not oppose the motion.
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).
__________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton
Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion
Filed: November 19, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Schuette v. Kleo Hatziladas and Newtak Pty Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-schuette-v-kleo-hatziladas-and-newtak-pty-lt-texapp-2010.