David Schuette v. Kleo Hatziladas and Newtak Pty Ltd.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 19, 2010·No. 03-10-00378-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN





NO. 03-10-00378-CV




David Schuette, Appellant


v.


Kleo Hatziladas and Newtak Pty Ltd., Appellees





FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-09-002784, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING



M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N


                        Appellant David Schuette has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, Schuette represents that “[a]ll matters in dispute between the parties have been fully and finally resolved in the underlying case and the necessity to continue the matter that is before this Court no longer exists.” The certificate of conference indicates that appellees do not oppose the motion. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

                                                                        __________________________________________

                                                                        Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: November 19, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

David Schuette v. Kleo Hatziladas and Newtak Pty Ltd., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

David Schuette v. Kleo Hatziladas and Newtak Pty Ltd. (David Schuette v. Kleo Hatziladas and Newtak Pty Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.