David Schied v. State Court Administrator

Michigan Supreme Court

David Schied v. State Court Administrator

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 24, 2012·No. 145027·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

July 24, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly 145027 Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly DAVID SCHIED, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 145027 COA: 306801 Court of Claims: 11-000050-MZ STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH, STATE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, and DOES 1-20, Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 24, 2012 _________________________________________ d0716 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

July 24, 2012 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly 145027 Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly DAVID SCHIED, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 145027 COA: 306801 Court of Claims: 11-000050-MZ STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL RIGHTS, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND ECONOMIC GROWTH, STATE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, and DOES 1-20, Defendants-Appellees. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 16, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. July 24, 2012 _________________________________________ d0716 Clerk

David Schied v. State Court Administrator, (Mich. 2012).

Pincite

David Schied v. State Court Administrator (David Schied v. State Court Administrator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.