David Scheider v. State of Florida
This text of David Scheider v. State of Florida (David Scheider v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 5D2023-3244 LT Case Nos. 2023-CF-489 2023-CF-733 _____________________________
DAVID SCHEIDER,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. James Hunt Daniel, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz. Public Defender, and Darnelle Paige Lawshe, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
October 8, 2024
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See O’Malley v. State, 378 So. 3d 672 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024); Parks v. State, 371 So. 3d 392, 393−94 (Fla. 1st DCA 2023) (holding that a cost imposed under section 938.27(8), Florida Statutes, is mandatory and recognizing conflict with D.L.J. v. State, 331 So. 3d 227 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021)), reh’g denied, (Sept. 27, 2023), review granted, SC2023-1355, 2024 WL 370043 (Fla. Jan. 31, 2024).
MAKAR, EISNAUGLE, and SOUD, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
David Scheider v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/david-scheider-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.